SXMElections.com
Unbiased look at the Sint Maarten Elections
SXMElections.com
SXMElections.com
Results Overview 2018
Parties 2018
Results by Districts 2018
Results By Hour 2018
Top Vote Getters/MP's 2018
Party Surfers
Candidates Votes History 2018
Male Candidates 2018
Female Candidates 2018
Parties Score Card 2018
Demographics 2018
Election 2024 snap
Election 2024
Election 2020
Election 2018
Election 2016
Election 2014
Election 2010
Election 2007
Election 2003
Election 2024 snap
Election 2024
Election 2020
Election 2018
Election 2016
Election 2014
Election 2010
Election 2007
Election 2003
Results Overview
Results by Districts
Results By Hour
Top Vote Getters/MP's
Party Surfers
Candidates Votes History
Male Candidates
Female Candidates
Parties Score Card
Demographics
1
John Larmonie Center
2
Sundial School
3
Senior Citizens Recreational Centre
4
Sister Maria Laurence School
5
Dutch Quarter Community Center
6
Milton Peters College
7
Rupert I. Maynard Youth Community Centre
8
St. Maarten Academy
9
Celebration Palace
10
Raoul Illidge Sports Complex
11
Charles Leopold Bell School
12
Leonard Conner School
13
Simpson Bay Community Center
14
Belvedere Community Center
15
Melford Hazel Sports & Recreational Ctr.
16
Methodist Agogic Center
17
Justice Academy
18
Seventh Day Adventis School
19
Prison
20
St. Maartens Home
1
OSPP
2
UPP
3
USP
4
SDM
5
SMCP
6
HOPE
7
PPA
8
DP
9
NA
Parties Score Card
Party Leaders Score Card
Year Info
Results
Parties
Candidates
Districts
Files
Files
St Maarten Elections In The News
Back to News Listing
Was The Meeting Held To Debate The Budget Illegal?
PFP
Source:
721 News
31 Jan 2022 08:27 AM
Member of Parliament
George Pantophlet
is asking the question as to why it is being said that passing the Budget without the approval of the Kingdom Council of Ministers is illegal. Pantophlet is not negating the fact that every Member of Parliament has to vote his/her conscience. “We all took an oath to do so. The meeting in which the Budget was discussed happened in accordance with article 34.2 of the rules of order which states: “As soon as the attendance list is signed by at least half plus one, the President opens the meeting. Said list remains at the table of clerk for signing by Members of Parliament arriving later”. Every member that signed the attendance list had an opportunity to debate, the draft budget at the time”, said MP Pantophlet. The 2022 Budget was voted upon and passed with 9 votes for and 4 against. As a matter of a fact, in handling this budget the MP expressed that he feels that the chair was quite lenient in allowing blatant non-adherence to the rules of order, as ‘points of notifications’ and ‘clarifications’ were turned into third and fourth rounds by asking additional questions, whereas Public Meetings consist of first and second rounds only. He applauds her poise in this regard as he is not sure whether he would have been so lenient. “What is abundantly clear is that Prime Minister
Silveria Jacobs
indicated that the new State Secretary of Home Affairs and Digitalization will forward a positive advice to the Kingdom Council of Ministers. This for me was sufficient to support the budget and also in conformity with article 100 of the constitution”, Pantophlet stated. The MP further stated that he is convinced that the new State Secretary would not have made such a statement to our Prime Minister if she doubted the outcome of her advice. “I’m sure that the members who voted against and those who were absent do not share the same sentiments. The
PFP
unfortunately is judging the State Secretary before getting to know her. Statements by the
PFP
such as a promise is a comfort to a fool, are careless. We know for a fact that the Kingdom Council of Ministers always approves the advice from the State Secretary. In addition to this, there were deviations approved from 5 previous budgets, so what makes this one different?”, said the MP. The MP said that voting on the Budget instead of postponing it is in conformity with article 100 of the Constitution. “We have nothing to do with the Kingdom Councils responsibilities. What is being left out of the argument of those who opposed approving the Budget is that the Committee for Financial supervision has complete insight into Governments operations and has approved said deviation. This alone gives me confidence that in combination with this advice and the positive advice of the State Secretary, the Kingdom Council of Ministers will approve the deviation”, MP Pantophlet concluded.
George Pantophlet
mentioned 1 time
Silveria Jacobs
mentioned 1 time
Party for Progress [PFP]
mentioned 2 times