SXMElections.com

Unbiased look at the Sint Maarten Elections

St Maarten Elections In The News Back to News Listing

Pfp: Reaction To Supreme Court Opinion

GS
NA
SPA
UPP
ND
UD
PFP
ECE
Source: 721 News 30 Jun 2024 09:21 AM

Failures to Protect Constitution aND Autonomy of Country Sint Maarten

PHILIPSBURG – Disappointed was the sentiment within the Party for Progress (PFP) after the Supreme Court in the NetherlaNDs issued their opinion on the Braam case in Curacao. The disappointment, however, is not with the opinion that has been issued, but with the fact that St. Maartens democratic process was interfered with by the Cabinet of the Governor. Awaiting the outcome of this Supreme Court opinion was used as a reason from Governor Ajamu Baly for not signing the SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree to appoint PFP caNDidate Mr. NDidate' href='/newspolitician/758/raeyhon-peterson'>Raeyhon Peterson LL.M., as the Minister of VROMI. PFP, via party leader aND member of Parliament NDidate' href='/newspolitician/755/melissa-gumbs'>Melissa Gumbs aND PFP member of Parliament NDidate' href='/newspolitician/741/lUDmila-de weever'>LUDmila de Weever issued a reaction in a media statement.

While self-proclaimed jourSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAlists aND political caNDidates masquerading as jourSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAlists have shared their very biased opinions on the matter, the reality is that NDidate' href='/newspolitician/758/raeyhon-peterson'>Raeyhon Peterson did not fail his screening, Gumbs stated. His screening reports, which he himself made public, aND other documentation prove that he passed his screening. The Governor, aND by some extent the then-formateur, now Prime Minister Dr. NDidate' href='/newspolitician/722/luc-merceliSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NA'>Luc MerceliSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NA, failed the democratic process of St. Maarten aND also violated the constitutioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl rights of NDidate' href='/newspolitician/758/raeyhon-peterson'>Raeyhon Peterson by failing to complete the formation process.

Gumbs is referring to the fact that at the time of the outcome of the screening process, Peterson was, according to existing case law, entirely capable of being sworn in as the Minister of VROMI. The principle of legal certainty aND the principle of trust are paramount in this case. When Peterson accepted his nomiSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtion, he had the right to assume that based on the current jurisprUDence aND St. Maarten laws, there would be no obstacles to his appointment as Minister of VROMI. However, Governor Baly refused to sign Petersons SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree, citing the unwritten constitutioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl norms that have been applied in the past when screening caNDidate ministers. Prime Minister MerceliSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NA aND the Governor then engaged in a bit of a back aND forth, during which the Governor sent the SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree back to the Prime Minister with the advice to retract or withhold it.

This was a gross misuse of the office of the Governor, Gumbs stated. The Regulation of the Governor itself says that in the event the Governor does not agree with a decree, he or she must seND it to the Kingdom for further haNDling. Until today, the Governor has not complied with his own regulation. I am curious if this cat aND mouse game was played because the Cabinet of the Governor was rECEiving warninSPArty/9/general-solidaire'>GS from The Hague that his position would not be sUPPorted. That would make this entire situation even more terrible because it would mean that NDidate' href='/newspolitician/758/raeyhon-peterson'>Raeyhon Peterson has suffered damage to his reputation for absolutely no reason.

We must also ask ourselves if human reactions following a crime committed against a person, means that someone is not integer aND cannot be a minister, de Weever mentioned. I would hate to think that, faced with a similar situation as Raeyhon, that maybe the Governor himself would be considered unfit for a position that should only focus on integrity aND good ethical coNDuct aND decision-making.

The reality is that formateurs in the past have been able to advocate for their caNDidate ministers on more than one occasion, Gumbs continued. I did this, as party leader, by providing an extensive explaSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtion, drafted with input by several legal miNDs, as to why Peterson was able to be Minister. The Governor, for whatever reasons he had, remained adamant in his persoSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decision to wait for the outcome of the Supreme Courts opinion, on a case that has nothing to do with St. Maarten or its laws. After all, St. Maarten doesnt have the stipulation on which the Supreme Court gave its opinion in our laws. But the Governor waited to see if his persoSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl opinion would be right, interfering with our right to form a government aND violating Petersons constitutioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl rights.

Gumbs is referring to the case of Eduard Braam, who was convicted without punishment of a case of sexual miscoNDuct when he was a company doctor. When he was submitted as a caNDidate minister, he was blocked based on article 7 of the SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl OrdiSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAnce for the Integrity of Ministers in Curacao. St. Maarten does not have this law or anything similar to it in its legal records. Peterson was convicted for pushing the person who almost killed him, without rECEiving a punishment, but this, PFP says, is where the comparison between him aND Braam eNDs.

Peterson was the victim of a drunk driver, who almost killed him, de Weever stated. A drunk driver. The videos are public for all to see. How does this affect his integrity to serve as a Minister? It says nothing about his ethics aND his approach to goverSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAnce.

Gumbs aND de Weever also highlighted the fact that ultimately, the SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree did not return to the Governor because MerceliSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NA, now in a new capacity as Prime Minister, did not seND it back to him after resigning his cabinet aND calling sSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAp elections.

Twice, the Governor disrespected our autonomy, our Constitution aND our right to form a government by returning the SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree relating to Petersons appointment, Gumbs said. Article 21 of the Regulation of the Governor is clear, aND the Governor does not have the authority to return any SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl decree sent to him. but can only seND it up to the Kingdom Council of Ministers for further haNDling. This, combined with a lack of a sense of urgency by the Prime Minister to protect the same Constitution aND the same constitutioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl rights of Peterson that he swore to uphold, is very discouraging. It means that this fake SPArty/23/national-alliance'>NArrative of Peterson failing his screening has been allowed to take hold.

Gumbs is referring, of course, to biased media reports that Peterson failed his screening, which has been the rallying cry of several opposition members as the sSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAp election approaches. One media outlet is even owned aND operated by someone who ran as a caNDidate on an opposition party slate.

Im not a conspiracy theorist, but this experience has only led me to question what was it?? Gumbs conclUDed. Was it exterSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl forces aND political opponents of PFP, working together to keep NDidate' href='/newspolitician/758/raeyhon-peterson'>Raeyhon Peterson out of that seat? Why are they so afraid of young, professioSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl politicians who want to clean up the mess, for no persoSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAl gain? I can imagine, considering the controversies that have plagued VROMI, both before aND after 10-10-10, there is some fear of anyone who promises to clean the house. Time will tell what happens next aND history will be the jUDge. But the fact remains: we cannot expect change if we are not willing to be uncomfortable aND to confront the reality of what has been happening uNDer everyones eyes, for decades. It takes strong leadership, determiSPArty/23/national-alliance'>NAtion aND uncompromising integrity to improve thinSPArty/9/general-solidaire'>GS, from VROMI to VSA to TEATT, everywhere. AND that is the character aND approach that Peterson was ready to take aND in fact, has been taking even though he was not sworn in.

The post PFP: Reaction to Supreme Court Opinion appeared first on 721news.com | Sint Maarten News | SXM News.

Luc Mercelina mentioned 1 time
Ludmila de Weever mentioned 1 time
Melissa Gumbs mentioned 1 time
Raeyhon Peterson mentioned 5 times

General Solidaire [GS] mentioned 2 times
National Alliance [NA] mentioned 51 times
St Maarten Patriotic Alliance [SPA] mentioned 60 times
United People's Party [UPP] mentioned 1 time
New Direction St. Martin [ND] mentioned 49 times
United Democrates 2018 [UD] mentioned 4 times
Party for Progress [PFP] mentioned 8 times
Empire Culture Empowerment [ECE] mentioned 2 times
SXMElections.com Corner Stone Solutions NV