Top Dutch lawyer critical of vote-buying case ruling
PHILIPSBURG--Where the Court of First Instance had provided a "beautiful motivation" for throwing out the Prosecutor's cases in the so-called vote-buying case, the Joint Court of Justice made a "somewhat artificial" decision last week in referring the case back to the lesser court for retrial, said top lawyer from the Netherlands Cees Korvinus on Monday.
Korvinus and his partner at their Amsterdam law office Alexander van Roy presented a lecture at the Courthouse Monday afternoon on recent developments in jurisprudence by the High Court in The Hague.
Referring to recent developments in connection with the inadmissibility of cases presented by the Prosecutor's Office, Korvinus told his audience, among whom was Court of First Instance Vice-President Judge Koen Luijks, that the Court's decision of August 2014 to throw out the case against four persons suspected of having sold their votes to United People's (UP) party in the September 2010 election "was exactly in line with High Court jurisprudence."
In what Korvinus described as a "beautiful motivation," Judge Luijks had declared the Prosecutor's Office's cases against suspects inadmissible Read more
Candidates in this article: